Main
back: Atsar replacement -3 next: References -2
|

I do not want to impose any conclusions. I showed some ways to reach
my goal. The solution of the XS library was quite a lot of work in this
particular case, but usually much easier. Both other solution were
really easy. The programs are much shorter and simpler than in the original
atsar, including the extra of a graphical display.
I support the arguments of Linus Torvalds in favour of communication in text
from /proc to the programs in stead of the traditional
communication in binary structures: alignment and byte-ordering
differences between systems makes life much harder than needed. Textual
communication requires string-parsing which is simple in most languages
but C, and has little overhead as long as the language supports
associative arrays (hashes).
Links:
- Tutorial web site
- http://mark.overmeer.net/yapc2001/
markov@ATComputing.nl
- Tutorial software
- http://ppresenter.org
ask@ppresenter.org
- Atsar software
- ftp://ftp.ATComputing.nl/pub/tools/linux/
- SWIG
- http://swig.sourceforge.net
|